← All playbooks·Media planning
Playbooks · Media planning
Benchmark share of voice against competitors
This job produces a single share-of-voice percentage and an SOV/SOM ratio for the client against a named competitor set over a fixed period. It feeds the decision on whether to hold, lift, or cut media weight to defend or grow share.
What you need first
- Category GRP or spend totals for the client and each competitor for the benchmark period, from the ad monitoring service (Nielsen Ad Intel, Kantar Media, or local equivalent)
- Confirmed competitor set, agreed with the client and matching their brief
- Client's own booked GRP delivery for the same period, from the media plan or post-buy report
- Client's market share (SOM) for the same period, from the retail panel (Nielsen/IRI) or client-supplied sales data
- Client's SOV or SOV/SOM target, from the brand's marketing plan, if one exists
The procedure
- Pull GRP or spend totals for the client and every named competitor for the exact benchmark period from the monitoring service, producing the raw weight table
- Lock the competitor set and date range against the client brief before running any numbers, producing a defensible comparison scope
- Sum every brand's GRPs, client included, to get total category GRPs, producing the denominator
- Divide the client's GRPs by total category GRPs to get SOV%, producing the headline figure
- Divide the client's SOV% by their SOM% to get the SOV/SOM ratio, producing the over or under-investment signal
- Rank the client against the category leader and closest competitor by SOV%, producing relative position
- Check for channel concentration, one competitor loading its weight into a single channel, producing a caveat if the comparison is TV-only but a rival is digital-heavy
- Write the one-line verdict stating SOV%, the ratio, and the position, producing the deliverable for the client
Worked through with numbers
Czech yogurt category, 4-week TV flight. GRPs: client 850, Competitor B 1200, Competitor C 640, Competitor D 410, remaining brands combined 300. Total category GRPs: 850+1200+640+410+300 = 3400. Client SOV = 850/3400 = 25.0%. Client SOM for the same period is 18%. SOV/SOM ratio = 25/18 = 1.39. Client sits second behind Competitor B (1200/3400 = 35.3% SOV), 10.3 points off the lead. A ratio of 1.39 means the client is outspending its share position by about 39%, consistent with a share-growth objective; if the brief calls for defending share rather than growing it, this level of overinvestment is wasted weight.
Where it goes wrong
- Match units across brands: use GRPs for everyone or spend for everyone, never GRPs for the client against estimated spend for competitors converted at a different CPP
- Match the period exactly: compare the client's campaign flight to the same calendar weeks for competitors, not to a competitor's rolling quarter that dilutes their peak weeks
- Cover every channel the competitor set actually uses: a TV-only comparison understates a digital-heavy rival's true share of voice
- Read SOV against SOM, never alone: a client's SOV can rise while SOM falls, which signals a defensive spend, not growth
How to know it is right
Recompute total category GRPs from the individual brand figures, confirm client SOV% times that total equals the client's booked GRPs, and check the SOV/SOM ratio's direction matches the client's stated objective (grow, defend, or hold) before sending.
Terms used